Dynamis and Energeia in Aristotle's Metaphysics
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper offers an interpretation of Aristotle's concepts dynamis and energeia (commonly translated as potentiality actuality) the thematic progression Metaphysics IX. I first raise question where motion fits in categories argue that locus system are doing suffering, which case respect can also be understood suffering. Next, analogy Aristotle draws IX.6 is between suffering substance. Finally, try to show it this kinetic nonkinetic variants energeia—and not distinction end-inclusive end-exclusive activities—that provides key understanding structure
منابع مشابه
By Peter Godfrey - Smith Theories and Models in Metaphysics METAPHYSICS
METAPHYSICS Peter Godfrey-Smith is professor of philosophy at Harvard University. He works primarily in the philosophy of biology and the philosophy of mind. He also has a more general interest in the philosophy of science, and makes excursions into metaphysics and epistemology. He has published two books so far: Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature (1996) and Theory and Reality (2003)...
متن کاملSome Remarks on Dewey’s Metaphysics and Theory of Education1
In a famous and much misunderstood passage in Democracy and Education, Dewey (1916/1980) proclaims: ”If we are willing to conceive education as the process of forming fundamental dispositions, intellectual and emotional, toward nature and fellow-men, philosophy may even be defined as the general theory of education (338; emphasis in original). My article examines some of what he means by this s...
متن کاملMetaphysics of science between metaphysics and science
The paper argues that metaphysics depends upon science when it comes to claims about the constitution of the real world. That thesis is illustrated by considering the examples of global supervenience, the tenseless vs. the tensed theory of time and existence, events vs. substances, and relations vs. intrinsic properties. An argument is sketched out for a metaphysics of a fourdimensional block u...
متن کاملMetaphysics and medical ethics.
I take issue with Frank Leavitt's sketch of a pragmatic criterion for the relevance of metaphysics to medical ethics. I argue that appeal to the potential for confusion generated by metaphysical subtlety establishes a need for better communication rather than shows philosophical insight beside the point. I demonstrate that the proposed Criterion of Relevance has absurd consequences, and I claim...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Philosophy
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0966-8373', '1468-0378']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12635